Wednesday, August 12, 2026

Chairman Babin submits statement on federal research security at China committee hearing

House Science Committee Chairman Brian Babin submitted a statement addressing federal research security at a recent Select Committee on China
X / Twitter
LinkedIn
Print

House Science, Space, and Technology Committee Chairman Brian Babin submitted a statement for the record on July 15 during the Select Committee on China’s hearing titled ‘Protecting American Innovation: The Federal Research Security Enterprise.’

In his remarks, Babin thanked Chairman Moolenaar for holding the hearing and said, “Today, we are here to address a matter of increasing concern for Congress and the American people: protecting our federally funded research and development enterprise.” He described threats from hostile governments and organizations as real and emphasized that protecting American research is a national security imperative.

Babin outlined that the purpose of the hearing was to ensure laws and directives enacted by Congress and the Executive Branch to protect U.S. research are implemented effectively across federal agencies. He also said it was important to identify gaps where additional guidance may be needed. He referenced National Security Presidential Memorandum-33 issued in 2021 by President Trump, directing agencies to safeguard U.S. government–supported research, followed by congressional action through the CHIPS and Science Act in 2022, which reinforced standards for federal research security.

“These measures form the backbone of our national research security framework,” Babin said. “They are meant to defend American innovation against foreign espionage, cyberattacks, and intellectual property theft—threats that are neither hypothetical nor distant.” He mentioned incidents involving attempts to smuggle federally funded research or sensitive data into or out of the country.

Babin noted that both his committee and others have sent letters seeking information on how agencies implement these requirements. According to him, responses showed significant confusion about expectations, timelines, and enforcement—a vulnerability adversaries could exploit. He said clear guidance from government is necessary so institutions can comply without facing unnecessary administrative burdens or conflicting requirements.

“I hope the goal of today’s discussion is to identify what is working, what needs improvement, and what Congress can do to strengthen our research enterprise,” Babin concluded.

Filed Under

Share This Story

X / Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Print

Advertisement

300 × 250

Related

Daily Dispatch

The morning briefing on federal government — delivered to your inbox before 7 AM.

Advertisement

300 × 120

More from Defense

Washington National Guard Continues Statewide Wildfire Response

The Washington National Guard continued deploying air and ground assets across the state on Aug. 10 as multiple wildfires burned simultaneously in the Pacific Northwest. Federal active-duty forces from Joint...

OCC Signals Push to Revive New Bank Charter Applications

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency announced on Aug. 11 that it will prioritize new bank charter applications as part of a “community bank comeback” initiative. The effort...

FDA Approves First Oral PCSK9 Inhibitor to Lower Cholesterol

The FDA approved the first oral PCSK9 inhibitor for lowering LDL cholesterol in adults on July 17, removing a major barrier to broader use of the most powerful class of...