Saturday, August 8, 2026

New Mexico lawmakers urge extended comment period on Chaco Canyon protections

New Mexico's congressional delegation has asked federal officials for more time on proposed changes affecting mineral protections near Chaco Culture
X / Twitter
LinkedIn
Print

U.S. Senators Martin Heinrich and Ben Ray Luján, along with Representatives Teresa Leger Fernández, Melanie Stansbury, and Gabe Vasquez of New Mexico, called on July 22 for the Department of the Interior to extend the public comment period regarding a proposal to revoke a 20-year mineral withdrawal protecting lands around Chaco Culture National Historical Park.

The lawmakers sent a letter to Secretary Doug Burgum expressing concern about the Bureau of Land Management’s decision to allow only 14 days for public comment on the Trump administration’s proposal. They requested that the department extend this period to at least 90 days and withdraw its plan to remove protections for Chaco Canyon. The delegation also invited Secretary Burgum to visit Chaco Canyon before taking any further action.

In their letter, they said: “Since your confirmation, we have written numerous letters and spoken to you directly expressing why protections for the greater Chacoan landscape are important and popular in New Mexico. Yet the process to revoke the protections continues to move at a rapid pace… We would like to register immense concern and frustration with the fourteen-day public comment period. Fourteen days does not represent the scope of this action, is arbitrary, and not representative of the work that went into implementing PLO No. 7923.”

They continued: “The Chacoan region is a natural and cultural landscape and not represented by isolated individual sites. The withdrawal you are proposing to erase was built from over a decade of community and Tribal input… The previous public process was robust and ended in protection of the Chacoan landscape. In contrast, the current process to remove protections is based on an inadequate and incomplete review. It certainly does not constitute full and meaningful Tribal consultation.”

The lawmakers referenced prior commitments made by Secretary Burgum before Congress regarding tribal consultation: “You committed before the House Natural Resources Committee to send an official with decision-making authority to conduct in-person consultation with every Tribe with an interest in Chaco. The draft assessment itself shows that commitment has not been met,” they noted. Several Pueblos received only invitations or informational meetings rather than formal consultations.

Concluding their appeal, they urged Secretary Burgum, “to extend the review process on his proposal,” engage meaningfully with Tribes in good faith, lengthen the comment period as requested, visit Chaco Canyon personally, and ultimately reverse plans for revoking existing mineral withdrawal protections.

Filed Under

Share This Story

X / Twitter
LinkedIn
Email
Print

Advertisement

300 × 250

Related

Daily Dispatch

The morning briefing on federal government — delivered to your inbox before 7 AM.

Advertisement

300 × 120

More from Defense

HUD, Census Report June 2026 New Home Sales Data

The Department of Housing and Urban Development and the U.S. Census Bureau released new residential sales data for June on July 24. The figures provide the most recent snapshot of...

VA Launches Trial of Ozempic Drug for Veteran Alcohol Use Disorder

The Department of Veterans Affairs launched a clinical trial of semaglutide as a potential treatment for alcohol use disorder in veterans on July 30. The condition affects an estimated 400,000...

EPA Proposes to Ease New Hampshire Ozone Compliance Burden

The Environmental Protection Agency proposed to withdraw New Hampshire from the Ozone Transport Region and separately ease the state’s vehicle inspection and maintenance program mandate on Aug. 6. The actions...