The Congressional Record is a unique source of public documentation. It started in 1873, documenting nearly all the major and minor policies being discussed and debated.
“JUST FOUR DAYS FROM NOW: THE NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE COUNTDOWN” mentioning the U.S. Dept. of Energy was published in the Senate section on pages S83-S85 on Jan. 28, 1998.
The publication is reproduced in full below:
JUST FOUR DAYS FROM NOW: THE NUCLEAR WASTE STORAGE COUNTDOWN
Mr. GRAMS. Mr. President, the American taxpayers sat down last night to listen to their Chief Executive speak about the state of the union and the future of our country. Bill Clinton knows how to give a good speech, and as we have come to expect, last night's was filled with lots of proposals and promises and reminders of some of the successes of the past year.
It is true--our nation has seen some good times recently. By returning accountability to Washington, we have brought the Federal deficit under control and reduced unemployment to its lowest levels this decade. We have cut taxes for working families for the first time in 16 years. The markets have soared to all-time highs and the economy is churning out rewards for anyone willing to work. Americans are feeling good about their country and about their futures.
Unfortunately, their President failed to warn them last night--even once during his 75-minute speech--that many of the achievements he acknowledged are at risk, threatened by a Federal Government failure so massive that it may take the taxpayers years, even decades, to burrow out from underneath it. What could be so potentially devastating? The failure of the U.S. Department of Energy to begin accepting the Nation's spent commercial nuclear fuel.
And, Mr. President, the taxpayers will inherit the responsibility for that failure just 4 days from now.
After 16 years of denials, delays, and indifference on the part of the U.S. Department of Energy, combined with the politics of special interest groups, the American taxpayers are about to find themselves saddled with the liability for our Nation's nuclear waste. It is a liability they do not deserve, and one they most certainly cannot afford.
The clock has been ticking relentlessly for 16 years, and on Saturday night, at midnight, the clock will finally run out on the taxpayers on this issue. After a decade and a half of playing ``cat-and-mouse'' with the Congress and the courts, it appears as though the DOE may be successful in ducking out of its responsibility. But that can only happen if Congress allows this Administration to get away with it unchallenged.
Mr. President, I stand before you today to pledge that this Senator will not let that happen.
For 16 years, the public has been assured that by January 31st, 1998, just 4 days from now, the Federal Government would take responsibility for storage of the Nation's commercial spent nuclear fuel. Since enactment of the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982, energy ratepayers have been charged a one-mill fee per kilowatt-hour in exchange for this
``promise.'' Each dollar collected is from a consumer located in one of the 34 States that benefit from nuclear energy. Only those who benefit from the lower-cost nuclear power--not the general public--would supposedly fund the waste storage.
Dutifully, ratepayers around the country have paid their fees--to the tune of some $13 billion. For Minnesota alone, this translates into more than $271 million. For 16 years, these fees have poured into the Nuclear Waste Fund based upon a legal--and contractual--obligation that the waste would be removed.
Today, with $7 billion of those ratepayer dollars already spent, the waste is piling up. Nobody at the DOE wants it, nobody at the DOE is prepared to claim it, and because there is no place to put it, nobody at the DOE would be ready to take it by January 31 anyway. Again, that is just 4 days from now.
At the same time, energy consumers are pouring billions into the waste fund, ratepayers and utilities are continuing to pay for on-site storage at more than 70 commercial nuclear plants throughout the country.
In other words, ratepayers are being forced to pay twice for nuclear waste storage, all because the Department of Energy has failed to meet its legal obligations to the American people.
As troubling as this expensive delay has been, that fact alone is not the greatest affront to the American public. What I find most troubling is the financial risk the DOE has dumped at the feet of the taxpayers, because suddenly, every one of them will soon be on the hook for the nuclear waste debacle.
Since coming to Congress in 1993, I have watched the Energy Department play a protracted game of ``would not, could not, should not'' with the States, the ratepayers, and the Congress. It is a bob-
and-weave strategy the DOE has had 16 years to perfect.
In 1994, the DOE argued that it would not accept the nuclear waste by 1998 because the law did not require it to do so. At that time, Minnesota was threatened with a premature shutdown of its Prairie Island nuclear facility, again, due to a lack of on-site storage. The DOE's claim exacerbated an already difficult situation for the State legislature and Minnesota residents, as the State faced the very real possibility it would lose up to 30 percent of its energy resources.
But the Energy Department's flippant response at the time was, ``It's your problem, not ours.''
And so the States went to court. They sued and they won. In July of 1996, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the nuclear waste was the DOE's problem and that the January 31st deadline did apply. When the DOE argued that they would not take the waste, the court told them,
``yes, you will.''
Over the next few months, the DOE was silent on the issue. And so the States wrote to the department asking of its plans to comply with the court decision. The following month, the Department of Energy responded by writing to utilities soliciting their ideas on how they would cope with a failure by the agency to meet the deadline. Having exhausted the
``would not'' argument, the DOE was now arguing in essence that they
``could not'' comply with the law.
In June of 1997, the DOE, in direct defiance of the 1996 court order, again asserted that delay was unavoidable due to ``acts of Government in its sovereign capacity,'' and once again made it the States' and utilities problem, not theirs.
So back to court went the States and utilities.
Last November, the DC Circuit Court of Appeals, the same court that ruled the year before, again affirmed that the Department of Energy's obligation to accept the nuclear waste. The panel stated explicitly that the federal government could not surrender its responsibility or liability, and alluded to whether the DOE was putting the taxpayers on the hook for its failure to comply.
Mr. President, the estimates of potential damages and awards have put the dollar figure as high as $80 billion, and some believe it could go significantly higher. That is a public bailout of immense proportions that would rival the savings and loan bailout.
It was never the intent of Congress to put the taxpayers at risk when it enacted the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982. Nor is that the desire of the 34 States that have nuclear waste stored on-site; they would rather see the waste removed so the production of low-cost power can continue. Still, the Energy Department persists in opposing the people at every turn.
Mr. President, on December 29th, 1997, just a few weeks ago, the Department of Energy filed a ``Petition for Rehearing'' in an effort to nullify the earlier court rulings. This most recent stunt by the DOE reflects their new position that they ``should not'' be held responsible--technically or financially--primarily because these lawsuits have been heard in the wrong court.
After the DOE's cries of ``would not, could not, should not,'' it is now up to Congress to respond in the positive: we will protect the taxpayers; and we can develop a solution for resolving the nuclear waste storage crisis; and we must enact the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1997 as soon as possible, legislation I have coauthored with my friends and colleagues, Senators Craig and Murkowski.
Mr. President, our legislation would set in motion the implementation of a timely and environmentally sound waste solution, and was adopted by overwhelming, bipartisan votes last year in the Senate and House. Nevertheless, with conferee appointments pending, a veto threat from the administration may yet derail the bill. So once again, the Department of Energy is blocking the will of the people.
The taxpayers have the most to lose if the Department of Energy prevails and we accept the status quo. These are hard-working Americans who have to keep a budget and account for their spending, and they expect the Federal Government to exercise that same accountability with their tax dollars as well. With so many Government agencies and programs fighting for limited funds, how can the taxpayers possibly afford a multi-billion-dollar bailout of the Energy Department? How can the Nation's energy consumers afford additional on-site storage, early decommissioning costs, alternative fuel purchases to compensate for lost power? How can they afford refinancing the billions wasted from the Nuclear Waste Fund? How will the economy handle the loss of jobs and productivity that will certainly follow when energy costs begin to soar and generating facilities begin to shut down?
How is it possible that all of this will be set into motion just 4 days from now, and yet it did not merit a single sentence in the President's State of the Union Address last night?
The President last night also failed to mention that these costs will be borne as much by grandma and grandpa as they will by any corporate executives or Members of Congress. He did not mention that nuclear power is a fuel that burns nothing, thereby helping us achieve cleaner air and a better environment. He failed to mention that the costs of his global warming treaty will be even higher for every American if we continue to shut down nuclear power plants in favor of coal-burning technologies. And most regrettably, he failed to offer any kind of explanation into why his administration supports the Department of Energy as they unlawfully stick it to the American taxpayers.
While the DOE waits, and hides behind courtroom appeals, and shirks its responsibilities that it is legally bound to accept, Americans across our country can expect yet more rate increases and yet higher taxes from a government that is either too afraid or too incompetent to act.
How can we face ourselves come Sunday morning--just 4 days from today--if we simply step back and quietly allow this to happen? We could not, we should not, and we will not.
So finally, Mr. President, I urge my colleagues to reassure their constituents that come midnight on Saturday, the people will not be forgotten, that they will return to Washington next week and fulfill their oath to protect the taxpayers and ensure that their Government fulfills its obligation to them, and that we will never allow such a failure to happen again.
Thank you very much, Mr. President. And I yield the floor.
____________________
