The Congressional Record is a unique source of public documentation. It started in 1873, documenting nearly all the major and minor policies being discussed and debated.
“ENERGY PRICES” mentioning the U.S. Dept. of Energy was published in the House of Representatives section on pages H9409 on Oct. 28, 2005.
The publication is reproduced in full below:
ENERGY PRICES
The SPEAKER pro tempore. Under a previous order of the House, the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Emanuel) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. EMANUEL. Mr. Speaker, we are in the midst of an energy crisis. Gas is at $3 a gallon, and utilities are now predicting that families could pay as much as 70 percent more to heat their homes this winter. Natural gas prices are so high that the Energy Department predicts that the average natural gas bill for every family will be about $350 more this winter. Home heating oil used by many in the Northeast has skyrocketed. But while American families struggle with sky-high energy bills, and oil and gas companies are facing an entirely different picture, an entirely different crisis, to be exact, what to do with all their profits.
For example, yesterday Exxon Mobil reported that its profits increased by 75 percent in the third quarter alone; their revenues, more than $100 billion. Shell Oil said that their earnings increased by 68 percent. ConocoPhillips' third-quarter earnings surged 89 percent, and BP reported a 34 percent rise in quarterly earnings.
To summarize, as American families are struggling with massive energy bills, both at the pump and home heating, energy companies are reaping huge profits.
Now, Henry Hubble, Exxon Mobil's vice president, said, ``You have got to let the marketplace work.'' As a Democrat, I could not agree more, which is why I oppose what my Republican friends try to do, which is provide the oil companies $16 billion in taxpayer subsidies. To quote again the executive from Exxon Mobil, ``You have got to let the marketplace work.''
My view is we have got to stop corporate welfare in its worse take. If you are making $100 billion or a run rate of $100 billion, profits are at $9 billion for one quarter, the taxpayers should not be footing the bill, both at the pump and on April 15 when they are subsidizing corporate America, big oil. This is corporate welfare at its worst. The corporate oil companies should take their historic profits and use them, in my view, to execute their business plan. The taxpayers should not be subsidizing big oil's business plan. You are in the energy business. Drill for oil. Taxpayers should not be subsidizing it for $16 billion.
Remember, college grants, the Pell grant system for college education in this country is a little less than $12 billion a year. Our corporate subsidy, taxpayer subsidy, for corporate America for big oil is $16 billion. It is more than we actually give for college assistance for people going to college. And they are making, just one company alone,
$100 billion, $9 billion profit.
Right now Americans pay twice. Once at the pump, once on April 15, subsidizing big oil.
Again, Exxon Mobil's vice president, ``You have got to let the marketplace work.'' Therefore, give us back the money we are subsidizing you. That is not the free market when we are subsidizing corporate America. It is corporate welfare. It is time for corporate big oil to get off the welfare roles and start executing their business plan.
While Congress subsidizes big oil to the tune of $16.5 billion, we have cut home heating assistance to the elderly. What Congress would subsidize big oil for $16 billion and cut home heating assistance to senior citizens? A Republican Congress, but of course.
The energy bill we passed earlier this year contained $14.5 billion in subsidies to the energy industry. A few weeks ago we just had not done enough; in a refinery bill, a bill for oil and gas companies, which they did not even ask for, this Republican Congress gave them another $2 billion in subsidies.
This week the Resources Committee marked up a bill which would allow oil companies to drill near the coral reefs of Florida and in the pristine Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Yet at the same time, we are cutting the low-income heating assistance program that helps the elderly and those most vulnerable in our country. It is notoriously underfunded. As part of the energy policy Congress authorized an increase in funding to energy assistance to $5 billion. However, we only allocate $2 billion. Some of us voted to try to bring that up to snuff so we could do the full assistance for the elderly low-income, those most vulnerable, and we are underfunding it; therefore, a cut in the program.
My view is it is time we stop subsidizing big oil and stop having the taxpayers who are very stretched, do not ask them for $16 billion when you have record profits throughout the energy industry and are cutting assistance to our elderly and most vulnerable. We can do better. We need a new set of priorities, and we need to change the direction of this country to reflect the values of the American people and their generosity.
____________________