Chairs DeFazio, Napolitano, and Beyer Lead 130+ House Colleagues in Applauding the EPA & Corps for Withdrawing the Trump Dirty Water Rule, Call New Rulemaking Urgent

Webp adobestock 41036554
Adobe Stock

Chairs DeFazio, Napolitano, and Beyer Lead 130+ House Colleagues in Applauding the EPA & Corps for Withdrawing the Trump Dirty Water Rule, Call New Rulemaking Urgent

The following press release was published by the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure on Sept. 10, 2021. It is reproduced in full below.

Washington, DC - Today, Chair of the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Peter DeFazio (D-OR), Chair of the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment Grace F. Napolitano (D-CA), Chair of the Joint Economic Committee Don Beyer (D-VA) and 139 U.S. House Representatives sent a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) applauding the agencies’ withdrawal of the deeply flawed Navigable Waters Protection Rule (NWPR), commonly known as the Trump Dirty Water Rule. The group of lawmakers also called on the EPA and the Corps to put a new rulemaking into place that is based on science and protects U.S. waters and wetlands.

“First," the representatives began, “we are pleased that the agencies are working to expeditiously replace the Trump Dirty Water Rule and are glad to see that the agencies will no longer be implementing it. However, as you know, the rulemaking process can be a lengthy one, and rightfully so, to ensure fruitful stakeholder engagement and thoughtful deliberations. Even if the administration expedites a replacement rule, it will take two or three years before a new rule is in place. In the meantime, countless waters and wetlands remain vulnerable to pollution, degradation, and destruction, and American families will pay the cost of this destruction through more polluted waters, less protected drinking water sources, greater flood risk, and a degraded environment. Therefore, we call upon you to ensure that any interim guidelines for asserting federal clean water protections maximize your authorities under the law and existing regulations, as guided by relevant court decisions, and are consistent with the science."

“Second," the representatives continued, “we call upon you to expeditiously put in place an enduring, scientifically-based, and protective standard for ensuring the protection of our critical waters and wetlands."

Additional Background:

In February 2021, DeFazio and Napolitano sent a letter to President Joe Biden urging him to repeal the Trump Dirty Water Rule.

In June 2021, DeFazio and Napolitano released statements after the EPA announced that it was withdrawing the Trump Dirty Water Rule, beginning an extensive stakeholder engagement process, and getting to work on a replacement rule.

In August 2021, DeFazio and Napolitano released statements after a federal judge in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona overturned the Dirty Water Rule.

The full letter can be found below and here.

Sept. 10, 2021

The Honorable Michael Regan

Administrator

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.

Washington, D.C. 20460

Mr. Jaime Pinkham

Acting Assistant Secretary of the Army for Civil Works

108 Army Pentagon

Room 3E446

Washington, DC 20310-0108

Dear Administrator Regan and Acting Assistant Secretary Pinkham:

Thank you for the June 9, 2021, announcement by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) of the agencies’ intent to revise the definition of “waters of the United States" (WOTUS) under the Clean Water Act.[1] (file://trans00/dem/Press/Press%20Releases/Majority%202021/Water/2021-09-07%20PR%20PAD%20GN%20Beyer%20WOTUS%20Letter%20to%20EPA.docx#_ftn1) We appreciate the Biden administration’s commitment to establish a lasting and legally defensible definition of “waters of the United States."

Additionally, we applaud the agencies’ decision to halt implementation of the deeply flawed Navigable Waters Protection Rule (NWPR),[2] (file://trans00/dem/Press/Press%20Releases/Majority%202021/Water/2021-09-07%20PR%20PAD%20GN%20Beyer%20WOTUS%20Letter%20to%20EPA.docx#_ftn2) more appropriately called the Trump Dirty Water Rule, in light of the order of the District Court for the District of Arizona to vacate and remand the Rule.[3] (file://trans00/dem/Press/Press%20Releases/Majority%202021/Water/2021-09-07%20PR%20PAD%20GN%20Beyer%20WOTUS%20Letter%20to%20EPA.docx#_ftn3) As the Court noted, this illegal rule results in “serious environmental harm" every day it remains in effect as countless waterways are irrevocably degraded, destroyed, or otherwise lost.[4] (file://trans00/dem/Press/Press%20Releases/Majority%202021/Water/2021-09-07%20PR%20PAD%20GN%20Beyer%20WOTUS%20Letter%20to%20EPA.docx#_ftn4)

Americans depend on clean water. We need clean water upstream to have healthy communities downstream. The health of rivers, lakes, bays, and coastal waters depends on the streams and wetlands where they begin. Streams and wetlands provide many benefits to communities by trapping floodwaters, recharging groundwater supplies, filtering pollution, and providing habitat for fish and wildlife. About 117 million Americans-one in three people-get drinking water from sources fed by streams that are especially vulnerable to pollution. Our cherished way of life depends on clean water and healthy ecosystems to provide wildlife habitat and places to fish, paddle, surf, and swim. Our economy depends on clean water for manufacturing, farming, tourism, recreation, energy production, and other economic sectors to function and flourish.

The Trump Dirty Water Rule transferred the costs for protecting the health and safety of our communities from polluters onto working American families. It squandered our nation’s precious natural resources-including our oceans, rivers, streams, and wetlands-to unfettered pollution and destruction. In crafting this rule, the Trump administration willfully ignored the science, ignored the law, and made clear that they stood with special interests and polluters rather than the American people. The Trump Dirty Water Rule even failed to accomplish the central pretext on which it was promulgated, because it provided no certainty on what waters remain protected, provided no clarity to stakeholders who must interact with the Clean Water Act, and failed to meet even a most basic economic justification. Finally, this rule was based on a misinterpretation of the standards for asserting Clean Water Act jurisdiction announced by the U.S. Supreme Court and was almost exclusively premised on a legal theory that failed to ever achieve a majority vote.

In striking down the Trump Dirty Water Rule, the District Court, in Pascua Yaqui Tribe, highlighted the magnitude of the adverse impacts of this illegal Rule, noting that in just 11 months, “the Corps made approved jurisdictional determinations under the NWPR of 40,211 aquatic resources or water features, and found that approximately 76% were non-jurisdictional."[5] (file://trans00/dem/Press/Press%20Releases/Majority%202021/Water/2021-09-07%20PR%20PAD%20GN%20Beyer%20WOTUS%20Letter%20to%20EPA.docx#_ftn5) Similarly, the District Court highlighted how the EPA and the Corps documented 333 projects that would have required a federal permit prior to the Trump Dirty Water Rule but no longer do.[6] (file://trans00/dem/Press/Press%20Releases/Majority%202021/Water/2021-09-07%20PR%20PAD%20GN%20Beyer%20WOTUS%20Letter%20to%20EPA.docx#_ftn6) In arid states, such as New Mexico and Arizona, the District Court noted that nearly every one of the 1,500 streams assessed under the Dirty Water Rule were “found to be non-jurisdictional-a significant shift from the status of streams under both the Clean Water Rule and the pre-2015 regulatory regime."[7] (file://trans00/dem/Press/Press%20Releases/Majority%202021/Water/2021-09-07%20PR%20PAD%20GN%20Beyer%20WOTUS%20Letter%20to%20EPA.docx#_ftn7)

In short, the District Court has confirmed what we suspected-that the Trump Dirty Water Rule is a fatally flawed proposal, with no basis in the law and no basis in the science. Now that the Court has thrown out this blatant giveaway to polluters, we call upon you to take immediate action to protect our nation’s waterways for future generations.

First, we are pleased that the agencies are working to expeditiously replace the Trump Dirty Water Rule and are glad to see that the agencies will no longer be implementing it. However, as you know, the rulemaking process can be a lengthy one, and rightfully so, to ensure fruitful stakeholder engagement and thoughtful deliberations. Even if the administration expedites a replacement rule, it will take two or three years before a new rule is in place. In the meantime, countless waters and wetlands remain vulnerable to pollution, degradation, and destruction, and American families will pay the cost of this destruction through more polluted waters, less protected drinking water sources, greater flood risk, and a degraded environment. Therefore, we call upon you to ensure that any interim guidelines for asserting federal clean water protections maximize your authorities under the law and existing regulations, as guided by relevant court decisions, and consistent with the science.

Second, we call upon you to expeditiously put in place an enduring, scientifically based, and protective standard for ensuring the protection of our critical waters and wetlands. Decades ago, when rivers started catching fire, this country recognized the value of our water-related resources, as well as the inability of the states or the private sector to independently protect our rivers, lakes, streams, and wetlands, or to always act in the best interests of the nation. In response, Congress enacted the Federal Clean Water Act over the veto of former President Nixon to “restore and maintain the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters"-a standard for protecting clean water that was championed by Democratic and Republican administrations alike until the Trump administration.

The American people demand action to protect clean water. We urge you to take the necessary steps both to ensure, today, that our nation’s waters and wetlands remain protected to the maximum extent allowed under the law, and to move quickly to put in place a permanent, legally-and-scientifically defensible, and protective definition of “waters of the United States" which will put us back on the bipartisan path of protecting our nation’s waterways for future generations.

Sincerely,

Peter A. DeFazio

Chair

Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

Grace F. Napolitano

Chair

Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment

Donald S. Beyer, Jr.

Chair

Joint Economic Committee

Alma S. Adams, Ph.D.

Member of Congress

Pete Aguilar

Member of Congress

Colin Allred

Member of Congress

Jake Auchincloss

Member of Congress

Nanette Diaz Barragán

Member of Congress

Karen Bass

Member of Congress

Earl Blumenauer

Member of Congress

Lisa Blunt Rochester

Member of Congress

Suzanne Bonamici

Member of Congress

Carolyn Bourdeaux

Member of Congress

Jamaal Bowman, Ed.D.

Member of Congress

Brendan F. Boyle

Member of Congress

Anthony G. Brown

Member of Congress

Julia Brownley

Member of Congress

Salud Carbajal

Member of Congress

Tony Cárdenas

Member of Congress

André Carson

Member of Congress

Ed Case

Member of Congress

Sean Casten

Member of Congress

Judy Chu

Member of Congress

David N. Cicilline

Member of Congress

Katherine M. Clark

Member of Congress

Yvette D. Clarke

Member of Congress

Steve Cohen

Member of Congress

Gerald E. Connolly

Member of Congress

Jim Cooper

Member of Congress

J. Luis Correa

Member of Congress

Danny K. Davis

Member of Congress

Madeline Dean

Member of Congress

Mark DeSaulnier

Member of Congress

Ted Deutch

Member of Congress

Debbie Dingell

Member of Congress

Lloyd Doggett

Member of Congress

Veronica Escobar

Member of Congress

Anna G. Eshoo

Member of Congress

Adriano Espaillat

Member of Congress

Dwight Evans

Member of Congress

Bill Foster

Member of Congress

Ruben Gallego

Member of Congress

Jesús G. "Chuy" García

Member of Congress

Sylvia R. Garcia

Member of Congress

Jimmy Gomez

Member of Congress

Al Green

Member of Congress

Raúl M. Grijalva

Member of Congress

Brian Higgins

Member of Congress

Steven Horsford

Member of Congress

Chrissy Houlahan

Member of Congress

Jared Huffman

Member of Congress

Sheila Jackson Lee

Member of Congress

Sara Jacobs

Member of Congress

Pramila Jayapal

Member of Congress

Eddie Bernice Johnson

Member of Congress

Henry C. "Hank" Johnson, Jr.

Member of Congress

Mondaire Jones

Member of Congress

Kaiali‘i Kahele

Member of Congress

Marcy Kaptur

Member of Congress

Ro Khanna

Member of Congress

Daniel T. Kildee

Member of Congress

Ann Kirkpatrick

Member of Congress

Raja Krishnamoorthi

Member of Congress

James R. Langevin

Member of Congress

Rick Larsen

Member of Congress

Brenda L. Lawrence

Member of Congress

Al Lawson

Member of Congress

Barbara Lee

Member of Congress

Andy Levin

Member of Congress

Ted W. Lieu

Member of Congress

Zoe Lofgren

Member of Congress

Alan Lowenthal

Member of Congress

Stephen F. Lynch

Member of Congress

Tom Malinowski

Member of Congress

Carolyn B. Maloney

Member of Congress

Kathy Manning

Member of Congress

Doris Matsui

Member of Congress

Lucy McBath

Member of Congress

Betty McCollum

Member of Congress

A. Donald McEachin

Member of Congress

James P. McGovern

Member of Congress

Jerry McNerney

Member of Congress

Grace Meng

Member of Congress

Gwen Moore

Member of Congress

Seth Moulton

Member of Congress

Stephanie Murphy

Member of Congress

Jerrold Nadler

Member of Congress

Joe Neguse

Member of Congress

Marie Newman

Member of Congress

Eleanor Holmes Norton

Member of Congress

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Member of Congress

Ilhan Omar

Member of Congress

Frank Pallone, Jr.

Member of Congress

Chris Pappas

Member of Congress

Bill Pascrell, Jr.

Member of Congress

Donald M. Payne, Jr.

Member of Congress

Scott H. Peters

Member of Congress

Dean Phillips

Member of Congress

Chellie Pingree

Member of Congress

Mark Pocan

Member of Congress

Katie Porter

Member of Congress

Ayanna Pressley

Member of Congress

David E. Price

Member of Congress

Mike Quigley

Member of Congress

Jamie Raskin

Member of Congress

Kathleen M. Rice

Member of Congress

Deborah K. Ross

Member of Congress

Lucille Roybal-Allard

Member of Congress

Raul Ruiz, M.D.

Member of Congress

C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger

Member of Congress

Bobby L. Rush

Member of Congress

Michael F. San Nicolas

Member of Congress

Linda T. Sánchez

Member of Congress

John P. Sarbanes

Member of Congress

Mary Gay Scanlon

Member of Congress

Jan Schakowsky

Member of Congress

Adam B. Schiff

Member of Congress

Robert C. "Bobby" Scott

Member of Congress

Albio Sires

Member of Congress

Adam Smith

Member of Congress

Haley Stevens

Member of Congress

Marilyn Strickland

Member of Congress

Tom Suozzi

Member of Congress

Mark Takano

Member of Congress

Bennie G. Thompson

Member of Congress

Mike Thompson

Member of Congress

Dina Titus

Member of Congress

Rashida Tlaib

Member of Congress

Paul D. Tonko

Member of Congress

Norma J. Torres

Member of Congress

Ritchie Torres

Member of Congress

Lori Trahan

Member of Congress

David Trone

Member of Congress

Juan Vargas

Member of Congress

Nydia M. Velázquez

Member of Congress

Debbie Wasserman Schultz

Member of Congress

Maxine Waters

Member of Congress

Bonnie Watson Coleman

Member of Congress

Peter Welch

Member of Congress

Nikema Williams

Member of Congress

Frederica S. Wilson

Member of Congress

John Yarmuth

Member of Congress

-------------------------------

[1] (file://trans00/dem/Press/Press%20Releases/Majority%202021/Water/2021-09-07%20PR%20PAD%20GN%20Beyer%20WOTUS%20Letter%20to%20EPA.docx#_ftnref1) Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Press Office. (2021, June 9). EPA, Army Announce Intent to Revise Definition of WOTUS [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/newsreleases/epa-army-announce-intent-revise-definition-wotus

[2] (file://trans00/dem/Press/Press%20Releases/Majority%202021/Water/2021-09-07%20PR%20PAD%20GN%20Beyer%20WOTUS%20Letter%20to%20EPA.docx#_ftnref2) 85 Fed. Reg. 22250 (Apr. 21, 2020).

[3] (file://trans00/dem/Press/Press%20Releases/Majority%202021/Water/2021-09-07%20PR%20PAD%20GN%20Beyer%20WOTUS%20Letter%20to%20EPA.docx#_ftnref3) Pascua Yaqui Tribe, et. al. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, No. CV-20-00266-TUC-RM (D. Arizona Aug. 30, 2021).

[4] (file://trans00/dem/Press/Press%20Releases/Majority%202021/Water/2021-09-07%20PR%20PAD%20GN%20Beyer%20WOTUS%20Letter%20to%20EPA.docx#_ftnref4) See id. at 9.

[5] (file://trans00/dem/Press/Press%20Releases/Majority%202021/Water/2021-09-07%20PR%20PAD%20GN%20Beyer%20WOTUS%20Letter%20to%20EPA.docx#_ftnref5) Pascua Yaqui Tribe, et. al. v. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, No. CV-20-00266-TUC-RM (D. Arizona) at 9.

[6] (file://trans00/dem/Press/Press%20Releases/Majority%202021/Water/2021-09-07%20PR%20PAD%20GN%20Beyer%20WOTUS%20Letter%20to%20EPA.docx#_ftnref6) See id.

[7] (file://trans00/dem/Press/Press%20Releases/Majority%202021/Water/2021-09-07%20PR%20PAD%20GN%20Beyer%20WOTUS%20Letter%20to%20EPA.docx#_ftnref7) See id.

Source: House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure

More News