USDA Wildlife Services Posts FY2019 Data on Damage Management Actions and Funding Sources

Webp 1edited

USDA Wildlife Services Posts FY2019 Data on Damage Management Actions and Funding Sources

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

The following Stakeholder Announcement was published by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service on Oct. 5, 2020. It is reproduced in full below.

On October 5, 2020, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) wildlife damage management program, Wildlife Services (WS), posted its annual Program Data Reports (PDR) for fiscal year 2019. The reports are available on the USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) webpage, representing the 24th year that WS has shared this information about its wildlife damage management activities.APHIS Wildlife Services' activities seek to reduce or eliminate more than an estimated $232 million in livestock loss due to predation and $150 million in bird damage to crops caused by native and invasive wildlife annually. Comprehensive estimates of all types of wildlife damage are difficult to gauge but each year wildlife strikes cause $625 million in loss to American civil aviation also posing a potential loss of life. APHIS responds to requests for assistance from individuals, companies and other government agencies when wildlife causes or threatens damage to human health/safety, agriculture, natural resources and property.In FY19, APHIS encountered more than 31 million animals while responding to calls for assistance and dispersed 29.4 million wildlife from urban, rural and other settings where they were causing damage. APHIS dispersed almost 93 percent of the animals encountered. Not all conflicts can be resolved with nonlethal methods alone. Of all wildlife encountered, WS lethally removed 7 percent or 2.2 million, in targeted areas to reduce damage. Where lethal control is used, APHIS works to make full use of the resource which included the donation of 138 tons of goose, deer/elk, and other meat-more than 1 million servings of protein-for people in need. Program Data ReportsIn FY 2019, WS used $79 million in appropriated funds to help manage wildlife damage in every state and territory and to support special programs, such as managing feral swine damage and rabies in raccoons and other wildlife. APHIS also received funding from businesses, organizations, individuals and other government agencies that allows the program to maximize its scope and effectiveness. Last year, this "cooperative" funding totaled $93 million (54 percent) of WS' budget for field-based operational wildlife damage management (see PDR A for funding sources and expenditures nationally and by state).APHIS used almost half (45 percent) of WS' operational funding for field activities to reduce or prevent wildlife hazards to human health and safety, such as wildlife collisions with aircraft and disease transmission. APHIS spent about one-quarter (24 percent) of this funding to protect agriculture, including field crops, aquaculture, timber, and livestock. APHIS spent the remaining one-quarter on protection of property and natural resources, including threatened and endangered species.Data HighlightsThe PDRs list the work carried out by APHIS wildlife biologists and field specialists, with information by state, species, and other details. Some key FY2019 accomplishment include the following:Most species whose damage WS' actively manages, have increasing populations and/or expanding ranges. WS' balances its focused efforts to resolve wildlife conflicts with the program's stewardship responsibilities toward the long-term maintenance and health of wildlife populations.As a federal agency with public trust responsibilities to manage wildlife for present and future generations, APHIS complies with all Federal and state laws, such as the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Migratory Bird Treaty Act, and Endangered Species Act, as well as executive orders pertaining to invasive species management. APHIS conducts careful environmental review of all agency actions through a NEPA process that includes public involvement. To learn more, please visit the WS website.

Source: U.S. Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

More News