June 9, 2000 sees Congressional Record publish “SENATE RESOLUTION 320--TO AUTHORIZE TESTIMONY BY SENATE EMPLOYEE IN STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING”

June 9, 2000 sees Congressional Record publish “SENATE RESOLUTION 320--TO AUTHORIZE TESTIMONY BY SENATE EMPLOYEE IN STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING”

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

Volume 146, No. 71 covering the 2nd Session of the 106th Congress (1999 - 2000) was published by the Congressional Record.

The Congressional Record is a unique source of public documentation. It started in 1873, documenting nearly all the major and minor policies being discussed and debated.

“SENATE RESOLUTION 320--TO AUTHORIZE TESTIMONY BY SENATE EMPLOYEE IN STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING” mentioning the U.S. Dept of Labor was published in the Senate section on pages S4924 on June 9, 2000.

The publication is reproduced in full below:

SENATE RESOLUTION 320--TO AUTHORIZE TESTIMONY BY SENATE EMPLOYEE IN

STATE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDING

Mr. LOTT (for himself and Mr. Daschle) submitted the following resolution; which was considered and agreed to:

S. Res. 320

Whereas, in the Inquiry Relative to the Claim for Benefits of Yolanda Nock, pending before the Department of Labor, in the County of Sussex, State of Delaware, a subpoena for testimony has been issued to Elinor Hughes, an employee of the Senate on the staff of Senator William V. Roth, Jr.;

Whereas, by the privileges of the Senate of the United States and Rule XI of the Standing Rules of the Senate, no evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may, by the judicial or administrative process, be taken from such control or possession but by permission of the Senate;

Whereas, when it appears that evidence under the control or in the possession of the Senate may promote the administration of justice, the Senate will take such action as will promote the ends of justice consistently with the privileges of the Senate: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, that Elinor Hughes is authorized to testify in the Inquiry Relative to the Claim for Benefits of Yolanda Nock, except concerning matters for which a privilege should be asserted.

____________________

SOURCE: Congressional Record Vol. 146, No. 71

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

More News