Pitts-Led Forum Examines Protecting Conscience Rights

Webp 10edited

Pitts-Led Forum Examines Protecting Conscience Rights

The following press release was published by the House Committee on Energy and Commerce on July 8, 2016. It is reproduced in full below.

WASHINGTON, DC - The House Energy and Commerce Committee today hosted a forum discussion on conscience rights led by Health Subcommittee Chairman Joseph Pitts (R-PA). The discussion focused on the importance of preventing government discrimination against doctors, nurses, hospitals, and other health care entities that refuse to participate in abortions. Participants echoed a unified theme - #NoAbortionCoercion - that no American should be forced to participate in an abortion.

“Conscience is about choice. It is an unalienable right. It is simply unacceptable to force health care providers, charities, small businesses, and churches to violate their sincerely held convictions," said Chairman Pitts. “The Conscience Protection Act is critical to stop the government and those it funds from forcing health care entities to participate in or perform abortions against their deeply held moral, ethical, or religious beliefs. The states of California and New York continue to receive federal funding through the department of Health and Human Services (HHS) without penalty regardless of the fact that they are imposing abortion mandates on those with conscience objections to abortion."

Fe Vinoya, a nurse from New Jersey, spoke about how she became a nurse to help people, stating, “Participating in the destruction of human life is not only a violation of my religious convictions, it conflicts with my calling as a medical professional to protect life, not to end it."

Casey Mattox, Senior Counsel of the Alliance Defending Freedom, spoke about how conscience issues have not been a partisan issue in the past, stating, “In Roe [v. Wade] itself the Supreme Court acknowledged the importance of protecting conscience even as it created an abortion right, noting that the AMA recognized that medical professionals should never be ‘required to perform any act violative of personally held moral principles.’ Few disagreed."

Dr. Dave Weldon, former Member of Congress and author of the Weldon Amendment, discussed why he introduced his amendment, stating, “I authored this amendment to protect freedom for people to provide health care free from abortion and freedom for people to access health care and coverage free from the scourge of abortion."

Speaker Ryan (R-WI) announced earlier this week that the House will vote next week on the Conscience Protection Act.as it becomes available.

See Also

* Forum on Conscience Protections

Source: House Committee on Energy and Commerce