SCRANTON - The United States Attorney’s Office for the Middle District of Pennsylvania announced that a Scranton man pleaded guilty today to a federal heroin distribution conspiracy charge before Senior United States District Court Judge A. Richard Caputo in Wilkes-Barre.
According to United States Attorney Peter Smith, Camilo Andujar, aka “Melo," age 24, was indicted by a grand jury in October 2015 and pleaded guilty pursuant to a plea agreement filed by the government.
The charges stemmed from an investigation in which police made a purchase of heroin from Andujar and then obtained a search warrant for a residence located on Electric Street in Scranton, where Andujar lived. Police seized approximately 91 grams of heroin, equivalent to more than 3,100 individual retail bags of heroin. Police also seized a coffee bean grinder filled with heroin, $5,950 in cash, heroin packaging materials and drug paraphernalia.
The investigation was conducted by the Scranton Police Department, Special Investigations Division, Lackawanna County District Attorney’s Office and the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). The case is being prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Robert J. O’Hara.
This case was brought as part of a district wide initiative to combat the nationwide epidemic regarding the use and distribution of heroin. Led by the United States Attorney’s office, the heroin initiative targets heroin traffickers operating in the Middle District of Pennsylvania and is part of a coordinated effort among federal, state and local law enforcement agencies.
A sentence following a finding of guilt is imposed by the Judge after consideration of the applicable federal sentencing statutes and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines.
The maximum penalty under federal law is up to forty years in prison, a term of supervised release following imprisonment, and a fine. Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the Judge is also required to consider and weigh a number of factors, including the nature, circumstances and seriousness of the offense; the history and characteristics of the defendant; and the need to punish the defendant, protect the public and provide for the defendant's educational, vocational and medical needs. For these reasons, the statutory maximum penalty for the offense is not an accurate indicator of the potential sentence for a specific defendant.
Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of the United States Attorneys
