EPA administrator finds misuse of funds linked to Stacey Abrams' group

Webp ruyi4qsa3gc1hepsgcg65ltn9bsx
Lee M. Zeldin, the 17th EPA Administrator | Wikimedia

EPA administrator finds misuse of funds linked to Stacey Abrams' group

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

In a recent development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lee Zeldin has uncovered significant financial activities linked to the Biden-Harris administration. Zeldin highlighted the allocation of $2 billion from a total of $20 billion in gold bars to an organization connected with Stacey Abrams, raising concerns about oversight and ethical practices.

Zeldin stated, "I made a commitment to members of Congress and to the American people to be a good steward of tax dollars and I’ve wasted no time in keeping my word." He expressed suspicion over the rapid allocation of funds outside the agency's direct control, suggesting that some organizations may have been hastily formed to exploit these funds.

The Power Forward Communities, associated with Abrams, was one of eight recipients under the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund grants announced by the EPA in April 2024. The organization reportedly had only $100 in revenue before receiving this substantial grant. Zeldin remarked on this disparity: "It’s extremely concerning that an organization that reported just $100 in revenue in 2023 was chosen to receive $2 billion."

Further scrutiny revealed potential conflicts of interest within the EPA's grant processes. Jahi Wise, who directed part of President Joe Biden's climate grant program, did not recuse himself from awarding a significant grant to his former employer. This raised questions about impartiality and ethical standards.

Zeldin criticized past practices: "The waste and abuse were so deeply interwoven in the last administration that not only did the leaders who oversaw this not bat an eye at billions of your taxpayer dollars going towards partisan pet projects, but serious conflicts of interest were ignored."

The revelations have prompted discussions on how such funds are managed and distributed. The findings underscore ongoing debates about transparency and accountability within federal funding programs.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY