House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform Chairman James Comer has expressed support for the findings of a U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Inspector General review concerning inspections at Tennessee Walking Horse competitions. The investigation was initiated by the Committee during the 118th Congress, following allegations against the Biden Administration regarding enforcement of the Horse Protection Act (HPA). Concerns included arbitrary enforcement, lack of due process, and potential retribution against horse trainers by the USDA’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS).
Chairman Comer stated, "The USDA Inspector General’s review confirms our Committee’s findings of inconsistent enforcement of the Horse Protection Act by APHIS at Tennessee Walking Horse competitions. I am encouraged that these findings align and fully support the Inspector General’s new recommendations to strengthen the horse inspection process."
The Inspector General's report highlights several key areas for improvement. It notes that APHIS did not have a conflict-of-interest policy in place during the review but has since implemented one following recommendations. Additionally, APHIS is evaluating an on-site appeals process at competitions, addressing concerns about horse disqualification.
Veterinary inspection protocols were found to have critical gaps despite an existing framework. Furthermore, there were issues with communication between APHIS and show organizers regarding new rules and guidance, leading to confusion.
Comer emphasized that implementing reforms swiftly is crucial for restoring trust among competitors nationwide: "Key measures such as implementing a clear conflict-of-interest policy, enhancing the on-site appeals process and veterinary inspection protocols, and updating guidance for horse show organizers are essential steps toward restoring trust and ensuring consistent enforcement of the HPA."
