Chairman Pascrell Opening Statement at Oversight Subcommittee Hearing on the Opportunity Zone Program and Who It Left Behind

Webp 3edited

Chairman Pascrell Opening Statement at Oversight Subcommittee Hearing on the Opportunity Zone Program and Who It Left Behind

The following press release was published by the U.S. Congress Committee on Ways and Means on Nov. 16, 2021. It is reproduced in full below.

I believe places like my hometown of Paterson, New Jersey - which does have census tracts designated as opportunity zones - is the type of city that the creators of the incentive had in mind.

The program started with some embarrassing hiccups. In fact, one zone designation was reportedly expanded to benefit friends of Donald Trump and Steve Mnuchin. I expressed my outrage about that one to the Treasury Secretary.

The opportunity zone program was also deliberately structured with few, if any, strings attached to obtain capital gains relief. Nor is there a cap on the amount of relief an investor can receive.

Traditional metrics of community benefit, such as job and new business creation or the addition of affordable housing units, are not required to qualify for the capital gains relief.

Without requiring such demonstrations, it is difficult to assess whether investments are going into the neediest communities. We cannot determine if the program is effective in producing positive economic change for residents and businesses in need.

We need such reporting requirements to know: Are opportunity zones yet another tax incentive making the rich even richer? Is this program crony capitalism on steroids with the government picking winners and losers?

Sadly, in my hometown, there is scant evidence that the opportunity zone program is providing much benefit. Nationwide, there is concern that the benefits are mostly flowing to those zones that already were ripe for development and could provide certain returns on investments.

Robust reporting requirements will improve accountability and transparency. I am eager to hear our witnesses’ views on how to do this.

This hearing is especially timely as we have just received a second report on the opportunity zone program from the Government Accountability Office.

Both GAO reports help us ascertain whether this program is operating as Congress intended. It does not appear to be helping the neediest communities. Questions remain about who this program is helping and who is it leaving behind? And concerns persist as to whether the IRS even can tell if the participants in the program are complying with the rules.

I want to welcome our expert witnesses today. All of them have valuable information and insights to share on the opportunity zone program. I am confident their testimony will help us evaluate its operation and determine what changes should be made to improve it.

But before proceeding, I yield five minutes to Mr. Kelly, our Ranking Member, for his opening remarks.

Source: U.S. Congress Committee on Ways and Means

More News