In a recent development, the UK government has reportedly issued a secret order demanding that Apple provide backdoor access to encrypted data of users globally. The Information Technology and Innovation Foundation (ITIF) responded with a statement from its Vice President, Daniel Castro.
"Ordering Apple to weaken its end-to-end encryption is a dangerous and unjustified overreach that threatens the security and privacy of individuals and businesses around the world," said Castro. He emphasized that end-to-end encryption is vital for digital security, safeguarding confidential data from malicious actors. While law enforcement agencies should have some authority to access specific data during legitimate investigations, Castro argued that asking companies to undermine their own security features crosses an important line. "This is not about lawful access to data; it is about fundamentally weakening the technology that keeps Internet users safe."
The ITIF has previously warned about the UK's approach towards encryption. According to Castro, ordering Apple to alter its technology so that it controls encrypted data keys instead of users does not enhance security but rather diminishes it. "Encryption tools are widely available as open-source software and from providers around the world; they cannot be eradicated by government fiat," he noted.
The order may make commercial products less secure for ordinary consumers, businesses, and civil society, increasing risks related to cybercrime and unauthorized surveillance. As this order applies globally, its effects could undermine user security worldwide.
The ITIF called on the UK government to disclose full details of this order for public debate on this critical issue. Transparency is deemed essential when such decisions impact global privacy and security.
Furthermore, other countries valuing privacy are encouraged to oppose the UK's actions in international forums. "Allowing one nation to set a precedent that compromises global digital security should not go unchallenged," Castro urged.
He expressed concern about authoritarian regimes using similar justifications for circumventing encryption under national security pretenses while aiming at suppressing dissent and violating human rights.
"We urge the UK government to reconsider this misguided approach," concluded Castro. "Strong encryption is not a barrier to security; it is a foundation of it."
