The White House has announced an increase in funding for the Department of Commerce's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS). This decision comes amid growing concerns over the Chinese Communist Party's (CCP) efforts to acquire advanced U.S. technologies. Chairman John Moolenaar of the House Select Committee on China expressed his support for this move but emphasized that funding alone is insufficient.
"I fully support the increase in BIS funding, as recommended by the Select Committee on China in our recent DeepSeek investigation. However, funding alone isn’t enough to finish the job. We need to modernize BIS from top to bottom—giving it the structure, authorities, and urgency needed to stop the Chinese Communist Party from exploiting American technology. I look forward to working with the administration to deliver real results,” Moolenaar stated.
The Bureau of Industry and Security plays a crucial role in safeguarding U.S. national security by enforcing export controls on sensitive technologies. The CCP has been actively seeking advanced semiconductors, AI tools, and other dual-use technologies through illicit networks that take advantage of gaps in U.S. oversight.
In March 2025, the Select Committee released its DeepSeek report highlighting how the CCP bypasses export control laws to obtain cutting-edge U.S. technology. The report recommended significantly increasing BIS resources for enhanced screening, enforcement, and international coordination.
The new funding aims to expand BIS enforcement staff to investigate export violations and halt illegal tech transfers; modernize screening systems; improve coordination with allies; and bolster licensing review capacity.
This matter holds significance for Americans as advanced U.S. technologies are reportedly being used by China in military applications such as drones and missiles due to loopholes in export controls and weak enforcement mechanisms.
"BIS is our frontline defense, but it’s outdated and under-resourced," noted Moolenaar regarding the bureau's current capabilities against these challenges.
The implications extend beyond national security concerns, impacting American workers, industries, and service members when U.S.-origin technology enhances China's military or suppresses dissent globally.
