Amy Klobuchar, United States Senator from Minnesota | Twitter
Senators Amy Klobuchar and Lisa Blunt Rochester, along with Governors Laura Kelly, Andy Beshear, Maura Healey, and Matt Meyer, addressed concerns regarding the potential impact of a Republican bill on food assistance programs. The proposed legislation could result in millions of Americans losing access to food aid, including vulnerable groups such as seniors, children, and veterans. It is feared that this move would also lead to increased grocery costs and strain state budgets by transferring billions in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) expenses onto states.
Senator Klobuchar emphasized the detrimental effects of the bill: “Congressional Republicans are rushing to raise costs and take food away from millions of Americans, all to fund tax breaks for the wealthy.” She highlighted the potential consequences for those reliant on SNAP and urged action from Congress members: “It only takes four Republicans in the Senate or four in the House to make a difference.”
Governor Laura Kelly of Kansas warned about the broad economic repercussions: “This reckless legislation would force kids to go hungry and increase costs for all Americans... these cuts won’t discriminate—they would harm red states and blue states alike.” She pointed out an estimated $24 billion loss to the agriculture industry as one significant impact.
Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear criticized the bill's fiscal implications: “If passed, it will add trillions to our national debt and blow a hole in state budgets across the country.” He called for Congressional leaders to focus on supportive legislation rather than harmful measures.
Massachusetts Governor Maura Healey underscored SNAP’s role as an economic driver: “SNAP is a foundation for economic mobility that reduces hunger... It's an economic driver that injects $3 billion into the Massachusetts economy.” She urged Congress to reject cuts that would negatively affect local economies.
Delaware Governor Matt Meyer expressed concern over moral implications: “Taking away food assistance hurts families... slashing food assistance is more than just bad math; it’s bad morals.” He advocated for compassion over financial cuts.
The collective stance from these political figures reflects widespread opposition among Democratic leaders against shifting SNAP costs onto states and reducing federal support for essential food assistance programs.
