Supreme Court declines parental rights case; AFPI vows continued advocacy

Webp gina
Gina D’Andrea, Interim General Counsel at AFPI | LinkedIn

Supreme Court declines parental rights case; AFPI vows continued advocacy

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to hear the case of Lee v. Poudre School District R-1, which involves parental rights in public education. The America First Policy Institute (AFPI) responded to this decision, emphasizing their ongoing commitment to advocating for family rights and addressing ideological influences in schools.

The case arose from complaints by two Colorado families whose sixth-grade daughters were encouraged to attend a school-sponsored Genders and Sexualities Alliance meeting. According to court documents, a teacher distributed transgender flags and urged students to "come out," advising them not to inform their parents. Both families eventually withdrew their children from the school due to emotional distress and a loss of trust.

Despite the Supreme Court's refusal to hear the case, AFPI remains dedicated to its cause. Gina D’Andrea, Interim General Counsel at AFPI, said, "We’re disappointed the Court didn’t take this case—but our mission doesn’t end here." She further asserted that schools should not introduce complex ideas without parental knowledge and promised continued accountability efforts.

Justice Alito expressed concern over public school policies like those in question, describing them as "troubling" and highlighting the significant national importance of parental rights issues. D’Andrea reiterated AFPI's stance: "Every parent deserves the right to know what their child is being taught," pledging ongoing advocacy until this right is recognized nationwide.

AFPI will continue supporting the involved families and pursuing measures against any school system promoting harmful ideological agendas without accountability.

Information from this article can be found here.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY