Durbin questions judicial nominees on gun group ties and court order compliance

Webp 3lf6dpqi6mvu7zn1jcobskbd87y5
Dick Durbin, Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee | Official U.S. Senate headshot

Durbin questions judicial nominees on gun group ties and court order compliance

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

U.S. Senate Democratic Whip Dick Durbin, Ranking Member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, questioned two judicial nominees during a committee hearing in Washington on Apr. 29. The hearing focused on Arthur Roberts Jones, nominated to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, and Michael J. Hendershot, nominated to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio.

The proceedings are significant because the Senate Judiciary Committee serves as a standing committee of the U.S. Senate with authority over judicial and legal matters, according to the official website. The committee influences civil rights and public safety through its oversight and legislative responsibilities according to its official website.

During questioning, Durbin asked Jones about his recent involvement with Gun Owners of America, an organization known for opposing gun control measures more strongly than other groups. "Why did you join Gun Owners of America?" Durbin asked.

Jones replied that he joined at a "low-level" membership and said he would resign if confirmed as judge. When pressed by Durbin—"Do you share the Gun Owners of America view that the Second Amendment renders all gun laws unconstitutional?"—Jones declined to answer directly, calling it a "political" question.

Durbin responded: "You voluntarily joined this organization with radical views and now that is part of your biography before this Committee. If you want to make it clear that you now have changed your views or explain why you joined the organization, here is your chance. But to duck it and say, ‘I don't have to comment on this’ is to leave us with a conclusion you agree with them." Jones stated he does not consider Gun Owners of America's positions radical but continued not to answer directly when asked if their stance was extreme.

Turning his attention to Hendershot regarding voting rights litigation in Ohio courts, Durbin asked whether parties would be required to comply with court orders if Hendershot were confirmed as judge: “That would be my expectation, short of things such as a stay or an appeal,” Hendershot said.

Durbin followed up: “But once that process is exhausted... do you expect parties to follow orders?” Hendershot replied: “I would expect that.” When pressed further about resistance by Ohio’s Redistricting Commission after repeated state Supreme Court rulings against legislative maps between 2021–2023, Hendershot gave what was described as a jumbled response before affirming again: “I do expect lawful orders to be followed,” but then called further questions hypothetical.

The Senate Judiciary Committee affects constitutional protections and public safety nationwide via its legislative and oversight duties according to its official website. The committee aims both at upholding constitutional principles by reviewing legislation—including evaluating federal law enforcement—and scrutinizing judicial nominations according to its official website. Led by a chair who oversees meetings attended by senators from both major political parties according to its official website, it exerts influence over federal law across all states from Washington D.C., according also to its official site.

Video footage from this hearing is available online.

ORGANIZATIONS IN THIS STORY

More News